Difference between revisions of "Namd on BGQ"

From oldwiki.scinet.utoronto.ca
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Taking into consideration the official (test)[NAMD performance tuning recommendations], a parameter study was undertaken to test simulation performance and efficiency on the B...")
 
Line 102: Line 102:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils8, lblUnload=yes
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=8, lblUnload=yes
 
|12.9322
 
|12.9322
 
|0.58
 
|0.58
Line 108: Line 108:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils12, lblUnload=yes
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=12, lblUnload=yes
 
|17.2722
 
|17.2722
 
|0.77
 
|0.77
Line 114: Line 114:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils16, lblUnload=yes
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=16, lblUnload=yes
 
|16.0208
 
|16.0208
 
|0.72
 
|0.72
Line 120: Line 120:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils20, lblUnload=yes
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20, lblUnload=yes
 
|15.4154
 
|15.4154
 
|0.69
 
|0.69
Line 138: Line 138:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils12
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=12
 
|16.2079
 
|16.2079
 
|0.73
 
|0.73
Line 144: Line 144:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils16
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=16
 
|17.9231
 
|17.9231
 
|0.80
 
|0.80
Line 150: Line 150:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils20
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20
 
|17.9949
 
|17.9949
 
|0.81
 
|0.81
Line 156: Line 156:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils24
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=24
 
|17.8308
 
|17.8308
 
|0.80
 
|0.80
Line 162: Line 162:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils36
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=36
 
|16.9666
 
|16.9666
 
|0.76
 
|0.76
Line 180: Line 180:
 
|8
 
|8
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils20
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20
 
|18.2473
 
|18.2473
 
|0.82
 
|0.82
Line 186: Line 186:
 
|16
 
|16
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils20
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20
 
|17.9949
 
|17.9949
 
|0.81
 
|0.81
Line 192: Line 192:
 
|32
 
|32
 
|4096
 
|4096
|twoAwayXY, Pencils20
+
|twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20
 
|13.9414
 
|13.9414
 
|0.63
 
|0.63

Revision as of 17:26, 29 October 2012

Taking into consideration the official (test)[NAMD performance tuning recommendations], a parameter study was undertaken to test simulation performance and efficiency on the BG/Q cluster.

The following study was undertaken for a 246,000 atom membrane protein (Cytochrome c Oxdaise embedded in a TIP3P solvated DPPC bilayer) using the CHARMM36 forcefield (protein and lipids). Efficiency was measured with respect to the 16 ranks-per-node 512 core simulation.

Ranks Cores NAMD Config Options ns/day Efficiency
16 512 2.7874 1.00
16 1024 5.0483 0.91
16 1024 twoAwayX (default) 5.6204 1.01
16 2048 twoAwayX (default) 10.0699 0.90
16 2048 twoAwayXY 10.5875 0.95
16 4096 twoAwayX 14.3285 0.64
16 4096 twoAwayXY (default) 17.6313 0.79
16 4096 twoAwayXYZ 16.7962 0.75
16 8192 twoAwayX 23.5198 0.53
16 8192 twoAwayXY (default) 24.9981 0.56
16 16384 twoAwayX 23.6706 0.27
16 16384 twoAwayXY 28.3096 0.32
16 16384 twoAwayXYZ (default) 27.9791 0.31
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=8, lblUnload=yes 12.9322 0.58
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=12, lblUnload=yes 17.2722 0.77
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=16, lblUnload=yes 16.0208 0.72
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20, lblUnload=yes 15.4154 0.69
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=12 16.2079 0.73
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=16 17.9231 0.80
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20 17.9949 0.81
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=24 17.8308 0.80
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=36 16.9666 0.76
8 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20 18.2473 0.82
16 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20 17.9949 0.81
32 4096 twoAwayXY, PMEPencils=20 13.9414 0.63
4 512 2.8589 1.03
8 512 2.8367 1.02
16 512 2.7874 1.00
32 512 2.2951 0.82
16 512 unloadZero 2.7932 1.00

Documentation

  1. NAMD 2.9 User Guide
  2. NAMD Performance Tuning Wiki